Most of us are familiar with “Ban the Box.” In its original form, ban the box laws and ordinances were created to remove the criminal history question, and its attendant Yes/No box, from employment applications. Although criminal history inquiry is permitted later in the selection process, the intent of ban the box is to ensure that applicants for employment are considered based on their knowledge, skills, and abilities rather than being automatically disqualified based on criminal history. Sometimes referred to as “Fair Chance Policies,” ban the box is designed to give applicants for employment exactly that – a fair chance for employment.
Ban the box continues to spread. According to the National Employment Law Project (NELP), over 100 cities or counties and 18 states have adopted ban the box. Although ban the box sometimes applies only to public sector employment, at least 20 city/county/state regulations also apply to private sector employers. As ban the box spreads geographically, it also spreads in scope – one of the most recent examples being ban the box in the City of Philadelphia.
On December 15, 2015, Mayor Michael Nutter signed broad amendments to Philadelphia’s Fair Criminal Record Screening Ordinance. These amendments become effective March 14, 2016 and represent not just a change to when the criminal history inquiry may be asked, but rather a change to an employer’s entire criminal history screening program. Notably, the amendments apply:
Among the significant requirements for employers under the amended Ordinance:
These requirements are in addition to, not in place of, employer requirements under State and Federal FCRA laws.
The Ordinance provides an exception for positions where another ordinance or regulation requires exclusion of an applicant based on certain criminal history, but unless otherwise specified by applicable ordinance or regulation, the inquiry still cannot be made until a contingent offer of employment has been extended.
Philadelphia is not the only city to enact ban the box ordinances that extend well beyond the “box.” San Francisco and New York City have their own equally broad versions.
What’s an employer to do with this increasingly complex background check regulatory scheme? Besides working with legal counsel, ensure their background screening partner has compliance expertise and systems and processes in place to assist employers in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.
Jessica Cohen Taubman
Jessica Cohen Taubman is the Compliance Manager at EBI. She holds a Juris Doctor from the Emory University School of Law and a Master of Science in Criminology from the University of Pennsylvania, and is an active member of the State Bar of Georgia. Her legal background and experience in various facets of the criminal justice system have helped shape her work in the background screening and drug testing industries.
You already know about legal compliance in your industry. Healthcare companies know HIPAA, banking and financial services companies know DODD-FRANK […]Behind the Screen Part 3 – Compliance in Background Screening: What is it, and Why Should I care?
Hoping it would stem an ever-rising tide of class action litigation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), employers and […]The Supreme Court Makes Long-Awaited Decision in Spokeo FCRA Case