LinkedIn Shakes off the EEOC

Jennifer Gladstone

Share

Logo-2C-75px-TMLast fall four plaintiffs pushed LinkedIn into the spotlight, claiming the online networking site was operating as a consumer reporting agency (a background screening company) and was in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). 

The complaint alleged that information available through Linkedin’s “Search for References” feature constituted a consumer report under the FCRA. With just a few clicks, employers could get details about an applicant’s work history and even send private messages to former coworkers without the applicant’s knowledge.

The plaintiffs also alleged employers were making hiring and firing decisions based on the information obtained without the applicants’ consent, and that there was no way to ensure the accuracy of the references. The applicants were also allegedly denied the benefit of an adverse action notice that would have been required had the check been obtained in compliance with the FCRA.

LinkedIn attorneys argued that an employer could pick up a phonebook and find people who work at an applicant’s current employer, but information obtained that way would not be considered a consumer report, so info from coworkers online shouldn’t be either.

On April 14, 2015, a federal judge in the Northern District of California dismissed the case. U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal said LinkedIn is NOT a consumer reporting agency as defined by the law, so getting info from the reference reports is not the same as running a consumer report. Also, in their defense, LinkedIn pointed to the fact that people create profiles on the site to share their information. In his dismissal, the judge wrote that LinkedIn was not using the data to create a consumer report, but rather to carry out the consumer’s desire to share their data with the business community.

LinkedIn attorneys say they are pleased that the court dismissed the lawsuit, but the judge did leave the door open for the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. For now, LinkedIn seems to have avoided any action by the EEOC. 

Discover the EBI Integrity Advantage

Logo: LinkedIn

Employment Background Investigations is a technology driven leader in domestic and global pre-employment background checks, drug testing, occupational health screening and I-9 compliance. We specialize in development, implementation and management of customized employment screening programs for large and multi-national clients. We are dedicated to information security.  EBI is the only NAPBS Accredited background screening company in the world to hold both an ISO 27001:2005 certification for information security and an ISO 9001:2008 certification for Quality Management.

All content provided by EBI is published for the convenience of its readers and should never be deemed as legal guidance or advice.  Always consult your legal counsel for specific advice on state laws and industry regulations.

EEOC & FCRA

Jennifer Gladstone

Posted By: Jennifer Gladstone

Jennifer Gladstone is a news anchor and journalist with more than 20 years of experience in front of the camera. She's worked in several markets, large and small, and has performed nearly every task needed in a newsroom. As EBI’s Screening News Editor, she keeps EBI’s customers and blog subscribers up to date on the latest screening news and legislative alerts affecting companies of all sizes.

Comments